Variations in heat sources
The heat source EBM and SLM employ is among their most clear distinctions. EBM runs electron beams; SLM runs laser as the heat source. Smaller beam spot of the laser beam helps to generate intricate component forms and fine part characteristics. Nevertheless, the energy use efficiency of SLM is rather poor because of the different degrees of reflection of laser by metal materials. EBM is especially fit for manufacturing high thermal conductivity metals, high-temperature alloys, and high melting point metal parts including copper, Inconel 700, and molybdenum alloys since EBM uses electron beams as a heat source with improved energy efficiency.
creating a working space
Regarding forming environment, EBM technology accomplishes it under vacuum settings whereas SLM technology melts under inert gas conditions. Avoiding oxidation and oxygenation during the machining process of parts is more suited in a vacuum atmosphere, so enhancing the quality of the products. Furthermore, EBM technology preheats every layer of metal powder using electron beam scanning, thus enabling the components to be processed and formed within the 600–1200 ℃ range, so drastically lowering the residual stress of the produced parts.
Working with heated temperatures
While EBM can be prepared to a larger temperature range by electron beam scanning, SLM typically does not have a preheating temperature higher than 300 ℃. Apart from helping to lower residual stress, this high-temperature forming environment makes EBM technology possible to process some temperature sensitive metal materials and alloys feasible. Longer cooling periods and more complicated equipment maintenance are other difficulties, though, which this presents.
Mechanical qualities and part traits
Working principles and forming conditions affect the features of parts produced by EBM and SLM in somewhat different ways. Applications in the field of mold production would find great fit for the SLM technology produced parts since they have more accurate structural subtle characteristics and superior surface quality. Rough surface EBM parts are more common in several medical implant disciplines, nevertheless, because they offer improved biocompatibility and osseointegration. Furthermore rare are the deformation and stress cracking of EBM components, which provides EBM benefits in several high-strength and high-temperature applications as well.
Although their plasticity is somewhat poor, mechanical characteristics show that SLM specimens have more strength than EBM specimens both horizontally and vertically. This is mostly owing to the SLM forming process occurring at lower temperatures, with a faster melting pool cooling rate, which facilitates the formation of fast cooling structures such martensite. Usually conducted above the annealing temperature, the EBM manufacturing process produces a more homogeneous and stable structure via slow melt pool cooling rate. But following hot isostatic pressing treatment, the two techniques produced essentially the same microstructure, and the mechanical characteristics are therefore somewhat similar.
Tools and Prices and Equipment
Regarding equipment, EBM equipment calls for a vacuum system to sustain a high vacuum environment, therefore adding to the complexity and cost of the machinery. Furthermore, the equipment even must use premium steel plates with a thickness of more than 15mm to weld and seal the vacuum chamber due to the high pressure resistance of the four walls of the vacuum chamber, which makes the weight of the entire machine much heavier than other 3D printing direct manufacturing equipment. Simultaneously, the molding chamber needs a high degree of cleanliness to guarantee the smoothness of electron beam emission, which also causes tremendous challenges to process debugging. On the other hand, even if SLM tools have some degree of complexity, maintenance difficulty and overall cost are rather minimal.
Though its forming efficiency is often better than SLM, EBM equipment has a higher cost. This is mostly because EBM may use powder materials with thicker monolayers and bigger particle sizes, therefore reducing the forming time. Furthermore improving the forming efficiency is EBM's lack of auxiliary support systems throughout the forming process.
application field
EBM and SLM have different application areas since their heat source, forming environment, generating temperature, and part qualities differ. In terms of detailed characteristics and complexity of parts, SLM has greater benefits; it is also appropriate for manufacturing parts with complicated forms and high-precision need. More suited for manufacturing components with high strength and high temperature uses, EBM is superior than SLM in reducing residual stress in parts and can manage some temperature sensitive metal materials and alloys.
Particularly in sectors including aerospace, medical devices, and automotive manufacture, SLM technology offers lightweight and high-performance solutions for complicated component manufacture. High-performance parts in aerospace, nuclear, medical, aerospace, and other sectors are manufactured using EBM technology in great abundance. EBM technology, for instance, can be utilized in the aerospace sector to produce important parts including engine blades and turbine disks; in the nuclear sector it can be used to produce control rods and fuel elements in nuclear reactors.
https://www.china-3dprinting.com/metal-3d-printing/aluminum-3d-printing-bicycle-products.html